16
between Hong Kong and the Treasury Chest Officer
would result in a loss to Hong Kong and a gain
to the Treasury Chest Officer. There is not the
'one pocket' principle involved as the Hong Kong
funds are quite distinct from United Kingdom funds.
We have no evidence as to the rates obtained by the
But her end bij Treasury Chest Officer (1.e. whether more favourable
than the 'paper' rates) on which to base any com-
parison but if he secures a more favourable rate than
the 'paper' selling rates for sterling, i.e. lower
than the 'paper' rate, it naturally accentuates the
difference between them. As Hong Kong apparently
secures a rate more favourable than the 'paper'
buying rate, (i.e. higher than the 'paper' rate)
apart from this question of loss which Hong Kong
naturally wishes to avoid, Hong Kong also obviously
is not desirous of cutting out the Hong Kong and
Shanghai Bank and so imperilling its relations with
that institution, with probably an additional
resultant loss (free services plus 1 per cent
interest on its balances).
(The above minute was originally prepared
by lir.Palmer in December, but has been delayed due
to pressure of work on Estimates etc., and is now
revised).
31-1.55
46
In
134/1135
the absence of the rates abwhich Hong Kong remittances home
-See Leo. 11 -
Sleaving
no comparison
whether
avere
Car
made
be
acade
a
saving
would
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.